Keith
Megaloblatta
I was thinking about roaches that mate only once, and can be pregnant the rest of their lives. For surplus breeding in captivity that is great, and even in the wild when your looking at increasing population numbers.
But let's take blaptica dubia for example. We all know males are usually more abundant than females, and have wings which makes them easily capable of finding plenty of females in the wild. But when a female only mates with 1 male in her entire life, and it doesnt even have to be males fight for her to insure the father is strong, the first male she encounters impregnates her.
First of all doesnt that not ensure healthy offspring if any male will mate? Second, if lets say you only have 5 females in an area the size of a room in a house, if the females only produce offspring form one male, genetic diversity wont be there after a while and inbreeding will surely occur, and as far as I know that's a bad thing in the animal kingdom. If females mated with a new male each time, at least genetic diversity would be abundant per area. Basically there just popping out clones their whole lives, it doesnt seem right.
If you take most snakes that lay lots of eggs or birth lots of young (just like roaches) even they have a new mate each year. So why for roaches most only mate once, some live many years.
But let's take blaptica dubia for example. We all know males are usually more abundant than females, and have wings which makes them easily capable of finding plenty of females in the wild. But when a female only mates with 1 male in her entire life, and it doesnt even have to be males fight for her to insure the father is strong, the first male she encounters impregnates her.
First of all doesnt that not ensure healthy offspring if any male will mate? Second, if lets say you only have 5 females in an area the size of a room in a house, if the females only produce offspring form one male, genetic diversity wont be there after a while and inbreeding will surely occur, and as far as I know that's a bad thing in the animal kingdom. If females mated with a new male each time, at least genetic diversity would be abundant per area. Basically there just popping out clones their whole lives, it doesnt seem right.
If you take most snakes that lay lots of eggs or birth lots of young (just like roaches) even they have a new mate each year. So why for roaches most only mate once, some live many years.
Last edited by a moderator: